Co-Creating a Global Health Strategy

Co-Creating a Global Health Strategy

Background & Challenge

Uganda faces persistent and complex global health challenges that strain its health system and hinder progress toward universal health coverage. The country continues to battle high burdens of infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis, alongside emerging threats from zoonotic and vector-borne diseases. Maternal and child mortality rates remain high, particularly in rural and underserved regions, while growing concerns around antimicrobial resistance and pandemic vulnerability underscore the urgency of adopting a One Health approach (integrating human, animal, and environmental health)¹.

Despite these challenges, Uganda has made notable strides in expanding healthcare access and reducing disease prevalence, largely through strong collaboration between the Government of Uganda and international development partners such as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). USAID was one of Uganda’s largest health sector partners, investing over USD $350 million annually in a variety of technical areas such as disease surveillance, national laboratory services, one health and health emergency preparedness².

At the systems level, USAID has worked closely with Uganda’s Ministry of Health to enhance institutional capacity, financial management, and local ownership. For example, targeted interventions in budget execution improved health sector utilization rates from approximately 79% to 97%, unlocking an estimated USD $17 million in additional domestic resources³. However, persistent weaknesses—limited human resources, supply chain bottlenecks, fragmented data systems, and donor dependency—continue to pose barriers to sustainability and resilience⁴.

In response, USAID/Uganda was required to develop and implement a comprehensive Global Health Strategy to guide programming, partnerships, and investments. As Director of Performance with Q2 Impact, supporting USAID/Uganda’s Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) platform, I led the team that collaborated with the USAID/Uganda Global Health Office to co-create this strategy. Our shared goal was to align USAID’s investments with national priorities, foster stronger government stewardship, and promote a systems-based, data-driven, and collaborative approach to addressing Uganda’s evolving health challenges.

While USAID/Uganda’s health investments were extensive, they were distributed across multiple technical areas—health emergencies, health systems, One Health, and others—each with its own partners, priorities, and reporting requirements. Without an overarching strategy, the Global Health Office struggled to articulate collective goals, demonstrate cross-sectoral impact, or ensure resources were allocated to areas of greatest need and strategic opportunity.

Developing the strategy posed significant challenges. The process required extensive collaboration across a diverse network of stakeholders—including the Government of Uganda (Ministries of Health and Finance), the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), development organizations, non-profits, and implementing partners. Each operated under different mandates, funding streams, and performance frameworks, making consensus-building inherently complex.

Uganda’s health system context added further complications. Data systems were fragmented, limiting the ability to generate a unified, evidence-based picture of health outcomes. Coordination between disease programs was weak, and governance was often hampered by overlapping responsibilities. The health workforce—especially at district and community levels—faced chronic shortages and uneven capacity. These realities underscored the need for a strategy that would not only guide funding allocations but also strengthen the systems underpinning health service delivery.

Approach

Outcomes & Impact

To develop the Global Health Strategy, our team adopted a structured, collaborative approach designed to bridge diverse perspectives and align investments with Uganda’s health priorities.

We began with stakeholder mapping and engagement, identifying key actors in Uganda’s global health space to clarify roles, reporting lines, and investment levels. This was followed by data synthesis and evidence review, drawing on program performance data, health system assessments, partner strategies, and national policy documents, ensuring the strategy was grounded in empirical evidence and highlighted areas where investments could yield the greatest impact.

A series of co-creation workshops and consultations with the USAID/Uganda Global Health team allowed us to reconcile differing technical perspectives, negotiate priorities, and foster joint ownership of strategic decisions. Scenario planning and prioritization exercises helped visualize trade-offs and collaboratively determine funding allocations.

Co-creation required navigating institutional boundaries and balancing donor accountability with partner priorities. The challenge was not simply to produce a document, but to facilitate a shared vision—one that reflected USAID’s performance and investment priorities while empowering local actors to lead and sustain progress.

Finally, the draft strategy underwent iterative validation and alignment with both USAID’s global health objectives and Uganda’s national health policies. Feedback loops and real-time revisions ensured the final strategy was actionable, evidence-based, and widely endorsed.

The co-creation process resulted in the successful development and endorsement of the USAID/Uganda Global Health Strategy—a clear roadmap for prioritizing investments across technical areas. The strategy enabled USAID to align its resources more effectively with Uganda’s national health priorities while maintaining accountability to donor objectives.

Outcomes included:

  • Enhanced coordination and alignment: The strategy clarified roles across USAID, the Ugandan government, CDC, and implementing partners, reducing duplication and improving collaboration.

  • Evidence-driven resource allocation: Funding decisions were guided by program data and health system assessments, strengthening the impact of USAID’s investments.

  • Improved programmatic impact: Early implementation facilitated more coordinated interventions, contributing to improved outcomes in maternal and child health, nutrition, and epidemic preparedness.

Beyond the document itself, the strategy fostered a shared vision among USAID technical teams and partners, improving investment alignment, cross-sector collaboration, and accountability mechanisms. It laid the foundation for more resilient, responsive, and sustainable health programming in Uganda.

Footnotes

  1. UNICEF Uganda. Health Budget Brief 2023–2024. https://www.unicef.org/esa/documents/uganda-budget-briefs-2023-2024 Accessed 7 October 2025.

  2. World Health Organization (WHO). “USAID Global Health Security – WHO.” WHO Nepal, https://www.who.int/nepal/emergencies/usaid-global-health-security---who. . Accessed 7 October 2025.

  3. Management Sciences for Health. MSH Partners with the Government of Uganda and USAID to Strengthen Ugandan Health System. http://msh.org/story/management-sciences-for-health-partners-with-the-government-of-uganda-and-usaid-to-strengthen-ugandan-health-system/ Accessed 7 October 2025.

  4. UNICEF Uganda. Health Budget Brief 2023–2024. https://www.unicef.org/esa/documents/uganda-budget-briefs-2023-2024 Accessed 7 October 2025. 

Progress | Decisions | Solutions